lentil: be hard after cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.67
, legume
Weight: 0.65
, cereal
Weight: 0.64
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings black eyed pea
Weight: 0.63
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.37
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37
, chickpea
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard after cooking 1.00
increase during cooking 0.85
expand upon cooking 0.79
be used in cake baking 0.78
smell after dishwasher 0.76
come out of dishwasher dirty 0.76
is cooked 0.76
is hard 0.76
come after savory 0.75
is recipes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dish, come after savory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, increase during cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(dish, smell after dishwasher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(dish, come out of dishwasher dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dish, come out of dishwasher dirty)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cereal, increase during cooking)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dish, smell after dishwasher)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dish, come after savory)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dish, come out of dishwasher dirty)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cereal, increase during cooking)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dish, smell after dishwasher)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dish, come after savory)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, be used in cake baking)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cereal grain, expand upon cooking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, increase during cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dish, come after savory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(dish, smell after dishwasher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(dish, come out of dishwasher dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(wheat flour, be used in cake baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, be used in cake baking)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(cereal grain, expand upon cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cereal grain, expand upon cooking)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chickpea, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chickpea, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(lentil, be hard after cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lentil, is hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(lentil, is hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lentil, is hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lentil, is recipes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lentil, is recipes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lentil, is recipes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is recipes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dish, come out of dishwasher dirty)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cereal, increase during cooking)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dish, smell after dishwasher)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dish, come after savory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wheat flour, be used in cake baking)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cereal grain, expand upon cooking)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(chickpea, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cereal, increase during cooking)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dish, come out of dishwasher dirty)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dish, smell after dishwasher)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lentil, be hard after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dish, come after savory)