level: have high

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, security
Weight: 0.57
, aspect
Weight: 0.56
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.66
, minimum
Weight: 0.65
, intensity
Weight: 0.61
, basic
Weight: 0.56
, graduate
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high 1.00
is high 0.96
were high 0.93
have low 0.90
have high at night 0.87
be called high school 0.84
have high level cards 0.83
mess with high levels 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(factor, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(level, have high)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(factor, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(factor, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(high school, be called high school)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(factor, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(level, have high)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(high school, be called high school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(high school, be called high school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(level, have high)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(level, were high)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(level, have low)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(level, have high at night)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(level, have low)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(level, were high)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(level, have low)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(level, were high)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(level, were high)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(level, have low)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(level, have high at night)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(level, have high at night)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(level, have high at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(level, have high)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(level, have high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, is high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(high school, be called high school)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(level, have high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, is high)