level: were high

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.58 , security Weight: 0.57 , aspect Weight: 0.56
Siblings	high school Weight: 0.66 , minimum Weight: 0.65 , intensity Weight: 0.61 , basic Weight: 0.56 , graduate Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were high	1.00
have high	0.93
is high	0.91
have high at night	0.85
have low	0.83
be called high school	0.82
have high level cards	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(factor, is high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(level, were high)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(factor, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(factor, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(high school, be called high school)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(factor, is high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(level, were high)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(high school, be called high school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(high school, be called high school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(level, were high)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(level, have high)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(level, have high)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(level, have high at night)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(level, have high)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(level, have low)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(level, were high)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(level, were high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, is high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(high school, be called high school)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(level, were high) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, is high)