librarian: get paid in wet change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents teacher
Weight: 0.69
, professional
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, employee
Weight: 0.58
Siblings nurse
Weight: 0.35
, elementary school
Weight: 0.34
, dean
Weight: 0.34
, student
Weight: 0.34
, administrator
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid in wet change 1.00
get paid in change 0.91
get paid 0.82
is paid little 0.80
is paid 0.78
have get 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(teacher, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(teacher, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(teacher, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nurse, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(teacher, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nurse, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nurse, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(librarian, have get)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(librarian, is paid little)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(librarian, have get)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(librarian, is paid little)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid in change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(librarian, is paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(librarian, have get)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(librarian, get paid in change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(librarian, get paid in change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(librarian, get paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(librarian, is paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(librarian, is paid little)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(librarian, is paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(librarian, get paid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(librarian, is paid little)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(librarian, have get)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(teacher, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nurse, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(librarian, get paid in wet change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(teacher, get paid)