lieutenant general: be higher rank than major general

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.67
, rank
Weight: 0.56
Siblings lieutenant
Weight: 0.39
, police officer
Weight: 0.38
, commander
Weight: 0.37
, chief
Weight: 0.36
, deputy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher rank than major general 1.00
be higher rank than general 0.97
get to higher rank 0.92
be above major general 0.87
get to rank 0.86
outrank major general 0.84
feel like rank 5 0.83
be above general 0.80
outrank general 0.79
outrank major 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rank, feel like rank 5)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rank, feel like rank 5)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rank, feel like rank 5)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get to higher rank)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major general)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank general)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rank, feel like rank 5)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(police officer, get to higher rank)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(police officer, get to higher rank)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major general)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, outrank major general)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank general)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, outrank general)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lieutenant, outrank major)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lieutenant, outrank major)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than general)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be above general)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, be above general)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, be above general)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major general)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, be above major general)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lieutenant general, outrank major)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be above general)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank major)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, outrank general)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, outrank major)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lieutenant general, outrank major)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rank, feel like rank 5)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lieutenant, outrank general)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(police officer, get to higher rank)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lieutenant, outrank major)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lieutenant, outrank major general)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lieutenant general, be higher rank than major general)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rank, feel like rank 5)