life: be hard for people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, companion
Weight: 0.65
, family member
Weight: 0.63
, term
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mission
Weight: 0.63
, himself
Weight: 0.62
, relationship
Weight: 0.58
, retirement
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard for people 1.00
was hard for people 0.98
was hard for poor people 0.92
be hard for nice people 0.91
have hard 0.91
be hard 0.91
was for pilgrams hard 0.91
is hard 0.91
be harder for people 0.90
be difficult for people 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(retirement, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(relationship, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(relationship, is hard)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(relationship, is hard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(retirement, is hard)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(retirement, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(life, be hard for people)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, have hard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(life, have hard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(life, have hard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(life, be hard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(life, be hard)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, be hard for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(life, be hard for people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(relationship, is hard)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(retirement, is hard)