light year: be related to notation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents year
Weight: 0.67
, distance
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.53
, planet
Weight: 0.51
, object
Weight: 0.50
Siblings month
Weight: 0.36
, decade
Weight: 0.33
, season
Weight: 0.33
, summer day
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to notation 1.00
be related to scientific notation 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(year, be related to scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(light year, be related to notation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(year, be related to scientific notation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(year, be related to scientific notation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(year, be related to scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(light year, be related to notation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(light year, be related to notation)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(light year, be related to scientific notation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(light year, be related to scientific notation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(light year, be related to scientific notation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to scientific notation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to notation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(light year, be related to notation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(year, be related to scientific notation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(light year, be related to notation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(year, be related to scientific notation)