light year: be related to scientific notation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents year
Weight: 0.67
, distance
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.53
, planet
Weight: 0.51
, object
Weight: 0.50
Siblings month
Weight: 0.36
, decade
Weight: 0.33
, season
Weight: 0.33
, summer day
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to scientific notation 1.00
be related to notation 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(light year, be related to scientific notation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(year, be related to scientific notation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(year, be related to scientific notation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(light year, be related to scientific notation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(light year, be related to scientific notation)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(light year, be related to notation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(light year, be related to notation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(light year, be related to notation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to notation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to scientific notation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(light year, be related to scientific notation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(year, be related to scientific notation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(light year, be related to scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(year, be related to scientific notation)