lighting: be reaction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be reaction 1.00
be considered reaction 0.95
be chemical reaction 0.89
be considered spontaneous reaction 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lighting, be reaction)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lighting, be chemical reaction)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lighting, be considered reaction)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lighting, be chemical reaction)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lighting, be considered spontaneous reaction)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lighting, be chemical reaction)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be chemical reaction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be reaction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lighting, be reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lighting, be reaction)