lighting: have suck

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have suck 1.00
have suck bad 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lighting, have suck)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lighting, have suck bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lighting, have suck bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(lighting, have suck bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lighting, have suck bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lighting, have suck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lighting, have suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lighting, have suck)