lighting: have suck bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have suck bad 1.00
have suck 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(lighting, have suck bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lighting, have suck)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lighting, have suck)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lighting, have suck)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lighting, have suck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lighting, have suck bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(lighting, have suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lighting, have suck bad)