link: be in emails work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.70
, evidence
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.62
Siblings diagram
Weight: 0.58
, offer
Weight: 0.58
, clue
Weight: 0.56
, crank
Weight: 0.48
, learn
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in emails work 1.00
be in emails 0.98
be in twitter messages 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(link, be in emails work)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(link, be in emails)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(link, be in emails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(link, be in emails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(link, be in emails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(link, be in emails work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(link, be in emails work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(link, be in emails work)