lion: has state wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.62
, cat
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.61
, predator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiger
Weight: 0.70
, sea lion
Weight: 0.39
, elephant
Weight: 0.36
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.36
, panda bear
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state wild 1.00
live in wild 0.89
survive in wild 0.87
behave in wild 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tiger, survive in wild)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tiger, behave in wild)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tiger, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tiger, behave in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tiger, behave in wild)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(tiger, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tiger, survive in wild)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(lion, has state wild)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lion, live in wild)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lion, behave in wild)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lion, survive in wild)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lion, survive in wild)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lion, survive in wild)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lion, survive in wild)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lion, behave in wild)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lion, live in wild)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lion, live in wild)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lion, behave in wild)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lion, live in wild)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lion, behave in wild)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lion, has state wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tiger, behave in wild)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, has state wild)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiger, survive in wild)