liquid nitrogen: be good making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid
Weight: 0.76
, chemical
Weight: 0.67
, gas
Weight: 0.65
, agent
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.58
Siblings liquid water
Weight: 0.42
, nitrogen
Weight: 0.39
, ammonia
Weight: 0.38
, sulfur dioxide
Weight: 0.38
, water vapor
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good making 1.00
be made 0.86
be used make 0.82
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nitrogen, be good making)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(nitrogen, be made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, be made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nitrogen, be good making)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sulfur dioxide, be made)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(ammonia, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(nitrogen, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(nitrogen, be made)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(liquid nitrogen, be good making)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, be used make)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be used make)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, be made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(liquid nitrogen, be used make)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(liquid nitrogen, be made)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be used make)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(nitrogen, be good making)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sulfur dioxide, be made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ammonia, be made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(nitrogen, be made)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)