liquid nitrogen: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid
Weight: 0.76
, chemical
Weight: 0.67
, gas
Weight: 0.65
, agent
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.58
Siblings liquid water
Weight: 0.42
, nitrogen
Weight: 0.39
, ammonia
Weight: 0.38
, sulfur dioxide
Weight: 0.38
, water vapor
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be good making 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nitrogen, be good making)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(nitrogen, be good making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nitrogen, be good making)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, be good making)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(liquid nitrogen, be good making)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(liquid nitrogen, be good making)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, be good making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sulfur dioxide, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(nitrogen, be good making)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(liquid nitrogen, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)