liquor: be aged in oak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, industry
Weight: 0.54
Siblings vodka
Weight: 0.70
, whiskey
Weight: 0.65
, rum
Weight: 0.63
, bourbon
Weight: 0.58
, moonshine
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be aged in oak 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(liquor, be aged in oak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be aged in oak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(liquor, be aged in oak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak)