listen: be used to understand

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.47
, guy
Weight: 0.46
, word
Weight: 0.41
, statement
Weight: 0.41
Siblings know
Weight: 0.30
, hear
Weight: 0.30
, think
Weight: 0.30
, stand
Weight: 0.29
, mike
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to understand 1.00
causes understand 0.95
be motivated by understand 0.93
be used to understand what be be say 0.91
be used to understand world 0.90
be motivated by understand what be be say 0.90
causes hear and understand 0.89
causes understand what you be listen to 0.89
be used to understand problem 0.88
causes understand world 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(think, causes understand world)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to understand)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(think, be motivated by understand)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(think, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(think, be used to understand)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be motivated by understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(think, be motivated by understand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(think, be used to understand problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(think, be used to understand problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(think, causes understand world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(think, causes understand world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(listen, be used to understand)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(listen, causes understand)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(listen, causes hear and understand)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(listen, be used to understand what be be say)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(listen, be motivated by understand what be be say)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand what be be say)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(listen, be motivated by understand what be be say)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(listen, causes understand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(listen, causes hear and understand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(listen, causes understand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(listen, causes understand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(listen, be used to understand what be be say)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(listen, be motivated by understand what be be say)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(listen, be motivated by understand what be be say)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(listen, be used to understand what be be say)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(listen, causes hear and understand)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(listen, causes hear and understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(listen, be used to understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(think, be used to understand)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(think, be motivated by understand)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(think, be used to understand problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(listen, be used to understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(think, causes understand world)