litter: be at on beach

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34
, dog food
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at on beach 1.00
be at park 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash can, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at park)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(trash, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(litter, be at on beach)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(litter, be at park)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(litter, be at park)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at park)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at on beach)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(litter, be at on beach)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trash, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at on beach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)