litter: be problem at school

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.56 , garbage Weight: 0.56 , item Weight: 0.55 , problem Weight: 0.54
Siblings	fishing line Weight: 0.61 , trash bag Weight: 0.34 , trash can Weight: 0.34 , trash Weight: 0.34 , garbage can Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem at school	1.00
has state problem	0.87
is big problem	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(garbage, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(litter, be problem at school)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(litter, be problem at school)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(garbage, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(garbage, has state problem)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(garbage, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(litter, be problem at school)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(litter, be problem at school)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(trash, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(litter, be problem at school)

Similarity expansion

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(litter, has state problem)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(litter, has state problem)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(litter, has state problem)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(litter, has state problem)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(litter, is big problem)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(litter, is big problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(litter, is big problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(litter, be problem at school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(litter, be problem at school) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)