litter: be problem in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in uk 1.00
be in australia 0.77
has state problem 0.77
is big problem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(garbage, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(litter, be problem in uk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(litter, be problem in uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(litter, be problem in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in australia)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(garbage, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in australia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(garbage, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(litter, be problem in uk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(litter, be problem in uk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(litter, be problem in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trash, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(litter, be problem in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(litter, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(litter, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(litter, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(litter, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(litter, is big problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(litter, is big problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(litter, is big problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(litter, is big problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(litter, be problem in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(litter, be problem in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)