liverpool: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.69
, port
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, team
Weight: 0.57
Siblings manchester
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.36
, milan
Weight: 0.36
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.36
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(portsmouth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(liverpool, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(liverpool, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(liverpool, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(liverpool, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(liverpool, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(portsmouth, has quality bad)