living thing: need system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.75
, plant
Weight: 0.55
, nature
Weight: 0.52
, part
Weight: 0.45
, substance
Weight: 0.44
Siblings giant sequoia
Weight: 0.53
, here
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need system 1.00
need sensory system 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, need sensory system)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(living thing, need system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, need sensory system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, need sensory system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, need sensory system)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(living thing, need system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(living thing, need system)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(living thing, need sensory system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(living thing, need sensory system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(living thing, need sensory system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(living thing, need sensory system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(living thing, need system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(living thing, need system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, need sensory system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(living thing, need system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, need sensory system)