living: be in nebraska

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.59
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings life
Weight: 0.32
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.32
, poverty
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in nebraska 1.00
be in utah 0.84
be in iowa 0.83
be in oklahoma 0.83
be in arkansas 0.81
was through great depression better in iowa than chicago 0.81
be in kansas wellington 0.81
be in texas 0.80
be in illinois 0.80
be in colorado 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(living, be in nebraska)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(living, be in utah)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(living, be in oklahoma)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(living, be in iowa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(living, be in arkansas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(living, be in utah)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(living, be in utah)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(living, was through great depression better in iowa than chicago)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(living, be in colorado)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(living, be in texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(living, be in illinois)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(living, be in oklahoma)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(living, be in oklahoma)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(living, be in iowa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(living, be in iowa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(living, be in colorado)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(living, be in arkansas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(living, be in arkansas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(living, be in illinois)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(living, be in colorado)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(living, be in illinois)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(living, be in texas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(living, be in texas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(living, be in oklahoma)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(living, be in iowa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(living, be in illinois)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(living, be in colorado)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(living, be in utah)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(living, be in arkansas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(living, be in texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(living, be in nebraska)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(living, be in nebraska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(living, be in nebraska)