living: be in north africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.59
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings life
Weight: 0.32
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.32
, poverty
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in north africa 1.00
be in america countries 0.79
be in kenya 0.79
be in england 0.76
be in india 0.76
be in korea 0.76
be in france 0.75
be melbourne 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, be in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(life, be in india)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(life, be in india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(living, be in north africa)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(living, be in kenya)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(living, be in kenya)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(living, be in korea)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(living, be in america countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(living, be in france)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(living, be in korea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(living, be in france)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(living, be in america countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(living, be in kenya)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(living, be in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(living, be in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(living, be in america countries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(living, be in america countries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(living, be in france)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(living, be in kenya)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(living, be in korea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(living, be in france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(living, be in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(living, be in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(living, be in korea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(living, be in north africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(living, be in north africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(living, be in north africa)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(life, be in india)