poverty: be in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in india 1.00
exist in india 0.93
be in india problem 0.92
be in pakistan 0.85
be in america 0.84
be in sub-saharan africa 0.81
be in africa 0.81
be problem in usa 0.80
exist in australia 0.80
exist in canada 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(obesity, be in america)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(obesity, be problem in usa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be in india)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(obesity, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(obesity, be in america)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(obesity, be problem in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(obesity, be problem in usa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(poverty, be in india)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in india)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(poverty, exist in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(poverty, be in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(corruption, be in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(obesity, be in america)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(obesity, be problem in usa)