corruption: be in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in india 1.00
be problem in india 0.92
be reduced in future in india 0.85
be in pakistan 0.85
be in america 0.84
be in mexico 0.82
be in usa lower than in china 0.81
be on indian land 0.81
be in mexico bad 0.81
be in sub-saharan africa 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(corruption, be in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(evil, be in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(evil, be in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(corruption, be in india)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(corruption, be in mexico bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(corruption, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)