poverty: be reduced in future in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be reduced in future in india 1.00
be reduced 0.82
be reduced in afghanistan 0.82
be in pakistan increasing 0.81
increase in uk 0.78
go change in future 0.76
decrease in nepal 0.76
increase in singapore 0.76
be peculiar problem for india 0.75
be on indian land considered 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(crime, be on indian land considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(risk, be reduced)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(crime, be on indian land considered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(risk, be reduced)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be on indian land considered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(obesity, increase in singapore)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(crime, be on indian land considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be reduced)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(obesity, increase in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(obesity, increase in singapore)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(poverty, increase in uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(risk, be reduced)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(crime, be on indian land considered)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(obesity, increase in singapore)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(unemployment, be reduced)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(risk, be reduced)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(crime, be on indian land considered)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)