poverty: increase in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase in uk 1.00
increase in singapore 0.85
decrease in nepal 0.80
be reduced in future in india 0.78
be in pakistan increasing 0.77
be low in denmark 0.75
be problem in new zealand 0.75
be problem in zealand 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(obesity, increase in singapore)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poverty, increase in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(obesity, increase in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(obesity, increase in singapore)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(poverty, increase in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(obesity, increase in singapore)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be low in denmark)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)