corruption: be in mexico bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mexico bad 1.00
be in mexico 0.97
be in america 0.82
be in india 0.81
be high in latin america 0.80
be high in florida 0.79
be high in california 0.79
be in usa lower than in china 0.79
be in chicago damn high 0.78
affect people in australia 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(corruption, be in mexico bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(evil, be in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(evil, be in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(corruption, be in mexico bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(corruption, be in mexico)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in mexico)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(corruption, be in mexico)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(corruption, be in mexico bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(poverty, affect people in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(corruption, be in mexico bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)