poverty: exist in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist in india 1.00
be in india 0.93
exist in america 0.90
exist in canada 0.89
be in india problem 0.89
exist in uk 0.89
exist in australia 0.88
exist in zimbabwe 0.87
exist in south america 0.86
exist in philippines 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist in america)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(inequality, exist in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist in america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, exist in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist in uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(corruption, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(poverty, exist in india)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in philippines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(poverty, exist in philippines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(poverty, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in philippines)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in philippines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(inequality, exist in uk)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, exist in america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(corruption, be in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in india)