unemployment: be in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in india 1.00
be high in india 0.95
exist in india 0.93
be in india problem 0.92
rise in india 0.91
be reduced in india 0.89
be calculated in india 0.89
be reduced in future in india 0.85
be in pakistan 0.85
be in america 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, exist in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(unemployment, be in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in india)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)