lizard: be at tree trunk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.80
, reptile
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iguana
Weight: 0.68
, toad
Weight: 0.63
, chameleon
Weight: 0.60
, gecko
Weight: 0.59
, skink
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tree trunk 1.00
be at tree 0.91
be at shrub 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wild animal, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tree trunk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wild animal, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at tree trunk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lizard, be at tree trunk)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lizard, be at shrub)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at shrub)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at shrub)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lizard, be at shrub)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tree trunk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tree trunk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at tree)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at tree)