llama: be with sheep

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with sheep 1.00
be kept with sheep 0.91
protect sheep 0.91
make sheep guards 0.84
make good sheep guards 0.84
protect cows 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, protect sheep)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(alpaca, protect sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(alpaca, protect sheep)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(alpaca, be kept with sheep)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(llama, be with sheep)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(llama, protect sheep)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(llama, protect sheep)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect sheep)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(llama, be kept with sheep)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(llama, be kept with sheep)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(llama, be kept with sheep)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect cows)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(llama, protect sheep)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(llama, protect cows)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(llama, protect cows)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(llama, be kept with sheep)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(llama, protect cows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(llama, be with sheep)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(llama, be with sheep)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(alpaca, protect sheep)