local: is sustainable food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neighborhood
Weight: 0.53
, work
Weight: 0.52
, volunteer
Weight: 0.51
, visitor
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings greenwich village
Weight: 0.32
, other person
Weight: 0.31
, south park
Weight: 0.30
, homeless person
Weight: 0.30
, municipality
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sustainable food 1.00
is sustainable food better 0.98
is food 0.84
be healthier food 0.82
is food better 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(local, is sustainable food)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(local, is sustainable food better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(local, is sustainable food better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(local, is sustainable food better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(local, is food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(local, is food better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(local, is food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(local, is food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(local, be healthier food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(local, is food better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(local, is sustainable food better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(local, is food better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(local, be healthier food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(local, be healthier food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(local, be healthier food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(local, is food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(local, is food better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(local, is sustainable food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(local, is sustainable food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(local, is sustainable food)