location: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, spot
Weight: 0.66
, historical site
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.77
, construction site
Weight: 0.75
, central park
Weight: 0.71
, apartment building
Weight: 0.70
, shopping mall
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be for business important 0.99
be important for business 0.99
be for business 0.93
be good for business 0.92
be important to business person 0.90
be most important aspect of business 0.84
setting up new business 0.78
be important to people 0.78
setting up business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important to business person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important to business person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important to business person)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important to business person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(location, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(location, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(location, be for business important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(location, be important for business)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(location, be for business important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(location, be important for business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(location, be for business important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(location, be good for business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(location, be important for business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(location, be good for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(location, be important for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(location, be for business important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(location, setting up new business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(location, setting up new business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(location, setting up new business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(location, setting up new business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(location, be most important aspect of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important to business person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important to business person)