locomotive: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents steam engine
Weight: 0.74
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.66
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, train
Weight: 0.58
, boiler
Weight: 0.56
Siblings bullet train
Weight: 0.36
, train station
Weight: 0.34
, steam
Weight: 0.34
, tractor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
has quality good 0.82
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(diesel engine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(locomotive, has quality cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(diesel engine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(diesel engine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tractor, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(diesel engine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(locomotive, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tractor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(locomotive, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(locomotive, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(locomotive, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(locomotive, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(locomotive, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(locomotive, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(locomotive, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(locomotive, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(locomotive, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(locomotive, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(diesel engine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tractor, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(locomotive, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(diesel engine, has quality good)