lodge: be at resort area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, property
Weight: 0.57
, restaurant
Weight: 0.55
, republican
Weight: 0.53
Siblings campsite
Weight: 0.34
, campground
Weight: 0.33
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.33
, motel
Weight: 0.32
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resort area 1.00
be used to stay in resort 0.92
be at hotel 0.80
be at beach town 0.78
be at area 0.78
be at area of airport 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lodge, be at resort area)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lodge, be at resort area)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(place, be at area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lodge, be at resort area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(place, be at area)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(place, be at area)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at area of airport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lodge, be at resort area)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lodge, be at resort area)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(place, be at area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lodge, be at resort area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at beach town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(motel, be at area of airport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(motel, be at area of airport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lodge, be at resort area)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lodge, be used to stay in resort)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lodge, be used to stay in resort)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lodge, be used to stay in resort)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lodge, be at hotel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lodge, be at resort area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(place, be at area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(motel, be at area of airport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(place, be at area)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(lodge, be at resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)