lodge: be at hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, property
Weight: 0.57
, restaurant
Weight: 0.55
, republican
Weight: 0.53
Siblings campsite
Weight: 0.34
, campground
Weight: 0.33
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.33
, motel
Weight: 0.32
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hotel 1.00
be at restaurant 0.80
be at resort area 0.80
be used to stay in resort 0.79
be at inn 0.78
be used to unplanned for hotel need 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lodge, be at hotel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lodge, be at hotel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lodge, be at hotel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(motel, be used to unplanned for hotel need)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lodge, be at hotel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lodge, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lodge, be at hotel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(motel, be used to unplanned for hotel need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(motel, be used to unplanned for hotel need)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lodge, be at hotel)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lodge, be at resort area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lodge, be used to stay in resort)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lodge, be at inn)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at inn)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lodge, be used to stay in resort)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lodge, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(motel, be used to unplanned for hotel need)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(lodge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)