logic: be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement

Related concepts

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.65 , concept Weight: 0.64 , thing Weight: 0.60 , device Weight: 0.59
Siblings	point Weight: 0.63 , prolog Weight: 0.49 , theory Weight: 0.35 , principle Weight: 0.35 , philosophy Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement	1.00
be defined as axiom of human think	0.88
be attempt to explain observation use logic	0.79
be used to find truth	0.77
requires that one think objectively	0.77
be defined as love of knowledge	0.76
govern your action	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(concept, be defined as axiom of human think) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(theory, be attempt to explain observation use logic)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, requires that one think objectively)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(principle, govern your action)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(concept, be defined as axiom of human think) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(theory, be attempt to explain observation use logic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(theory, be attempt to explain observation use logic)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(principle, govern your action) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(principle, govern your action)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(philosophy, requires that one think objectively) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(philosophy, requires that one think objectively)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(logic, be used to find truth)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to find truth)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(logic, be used to find truth)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(logic, be used to find truth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(principle, govern your action)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(philosophy, requires that one think objectively)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(theory, be attempt to explain observation use logic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(logic, be defined as set of rule by which axiom can be manipulate to derive true statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)