# logic: has quality good

from Quasimodo

## Related concepts

 Parents disciplineWeight: 0.65, conceptWeight: 0.64, factorWeight: 0.60, thingWeight: 0.60 Siblings boolean algebraWeight: 0.63, pointWeight: 0.63, prologWeight: 0.49, multiplexerWeight: 0.48, theoryWeight: 0.35

## Related properties

 Similarity Property has quality good 1.00 has quality bad 0.96 is best 0.76 be such important part of good writing 0.75

## Clauses

### Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)

### Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72

### Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)

### Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality good)

### Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(logic, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(logic, has quality good)

### Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(prolog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Evidence: 0.68

### Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(logic, has quality good)

### Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(logic, is best)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(logic, be such important part of good writing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(logic, be such important part of good writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(logic, is best)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(logic, be such important part of good writing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(logic, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(logic, is best)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(logic, be such important part of good writing)

### Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)

### Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality good)

### Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(logic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74