london: be called foggy city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called foggy city 1.00
be called city 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(london, be called foggy city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(paris, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(london, be called foggy city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(london, be called foggy city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new york, be called city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(paris, be called city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(paris, be called city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(london, be called foggy city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(paris, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(london, be called foggy city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(london, be called foggy city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new york city, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(washington, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(washington, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(london, be called foggy city)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(london, be called city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(london, be called city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(london, be called city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(london, be called city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(london, be called foggy city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(paris, be called city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new york city, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(washington, be called city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(paris, be called city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(london, be called foggy city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)