london: be warmer than aberdeen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be warmer than aberdeen 1.00
be warmer than keswick 0.93
be warmer than russia 0.90
have warmer winter temperatures than montreal 0.88
have warmer winter than new york 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(london, be warmer than aberdeen)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than keswick)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than russia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(london, be warmer than keswick)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(london, be warmer than russia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(london, be warmer than russia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(london, be warmer than keswick)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than russia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than keswick)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(london, have warmer winter than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(london, be warmer than aberdeen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)