london: have dense population

Related concepts

Parents	new york Weight: 0.66 , north america Weight: 0.63 , birmingham Weight: 0.62 , singapore Weight: 0.62 , paris Weight: 0.60
Siblings	new york city Weight: 0.37 , south america Weight: 0.37 , latin america Weight: 0.37 , washington Weight: 0.36 , central america Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have dense population	1.00
have high population density	0.90
is densely populated	0.82
is most densley populated region	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(new york, have high population density) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(london, have dense population)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(singapore, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(london, have dense population)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(new york, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(london, have dense population)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(birmingham, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(london, have dense population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(new york, have high population density)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(birmingham, is densely populated)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(new york, is densely populated)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(singapore, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(singapore, is densely populated)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is densely populated)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(new york, have high population density)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(new york, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(new york city, is densely populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(new york, have high population density) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(london, have dense population)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(singapore, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(london, have dense population)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(new york, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(london, have dense population)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(birmingham, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(london, have dense population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(new york city, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(new york city, is densely populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(london, have dense population)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(london, have high population density)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(london, is densely populated)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(london, have high population density)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(london, have high population density)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(london, have high population density)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(london, is densely populated)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(london, is most densley populated region)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(london, is densely populated)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(london, is densely populated)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(london, is most densley populated region)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(london, is most densley populated region)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(london, is most densley populated region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(london, have dense population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(new york, have high population density)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(new york, is densely populated)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(birmingham, is densely populated)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(singapore, is densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(new york city, is densely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(new york, have high population density)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(new york, is densely populated)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(birmingham, is densely populated)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(london, have dense population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(singapore, is densely populated)