london: was built on thames

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was built on thames 1.00
be built on thames 0.97
was underground built 0.83
was built along river thames 0.82
was rebuilt after great fire 1666 0.81
was created 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(london, was built on thames)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(london, was built on thames)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(london, was built on thames)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(london, be built on thames)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(london, be built on thames)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(london, was underground built)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(london, be built on thames)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(london, be built on thames)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(london, was built along river thames)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(london, was underground built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(london, was created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(london, was built along river thames)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(london, was underground built)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(london, was built along river thames)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(london, was built along river thames)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(london, was created)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(london, was underground built)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(london, was created)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(london, was created)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(london, was built on thames)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(london, was built on thames)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(london, was built on thames)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)