long hair: be considered unprofessional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, guy
Weight: 0.57
, stuff
Weight: 0.57
Siblings braid
Weight: 0.53
, hair color
Weight: 0.36
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.36
, hair gel
Weight: 0.35
, beard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered unprofessional 1.00
is unprofessional 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beard, be considered unprofessional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(braid, is unprofessional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beard, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(beard, be considered unprofessional)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(braid, is unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(braid, is unprofessional)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(long hair, be considered unprofessional)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(long hair, is unprofessional)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(long hair, is unprofessional)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(long hair, be considered unprofessional)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(braid, is unprofessional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(beard, be considered unprofessional)