long hair: is unprofessional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, guy
Weight: 0.57
, stuff
Weight: 0.57
Siblings braid
Weight: 0.53
, hair color
Weight: 0.36
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.36
, hair gel
Weight: 0.35
, beard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unprofessional 1.00
be considered unprofessional 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(braid, is unprofessional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beard, be considered unprofessional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(braid, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(braid, is unprofessional)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beard, be considered unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(beard, be considered unprofessional)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(long hair, is unprofessional)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(long hair, be considered unprofessional)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(long hair, is unprofessional)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(braid, is unprofessional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(beard, be considered unprofessional)