loop: be designed into piping systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, configuration
Weight: 0.58
, maneuver
Weight: 0.57
, topology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings helix
Weight: 0.32
, bight
Weight: 0.32
, system
Weight: 0.32
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, optical fiber
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be designed into piping systems 1.00
be called systems 0.80
be designed 0.80
works with systems 0.79
be different from systems 0.79
be related to systems 0.79
be called pipes 0.78
be called light pipes 0.78
works with other systems 0.78
be provided in metal pipe lines 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be called light pipes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be called pipes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(system, works with other systems)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(system, be related to systems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(system, be related to systems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(system, be related to systems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(optical fiber, be called light pipes)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be called light pipes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(optical fiber, be called pipes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be called pipes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(system, works with other systems)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(system, works with other systems)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(loop, be designed into piping systems)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(loop, be designed into piping systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be called light pipes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be called pipes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(system, be related to systems)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(system, works with other systems)