loop: be provided in metal pipe lines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, configuration
Weight: 0.58
, maneuver
Weight: 0.57
, topology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings helix
Weight: 0.32
, bight
Weight: 0.32
, system
Weight: 0.32
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, optical fiber
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be provided in metal pipe lines 1.00
be called pipes 0.81
be called light pipes 0.81
be preferred over copper wires for communication 0.79
be preferred over copper wires 0.79
be designed into piping systems 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be called light pipes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be called pipes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(optical fiber, be called light pipes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be called light pipes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(optical fiber, be called pipes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be called pipes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(loop, be designed into piping systems)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(loop, be designed into piping systems)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(loop, be designed into piping systems)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loop, be designed into piping systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be called light pipes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be called pipes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(loop, be provided in metal pipe lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)