optical fiber: be preferred over copper wires

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.76
, substrate
Weight: 0.72
, light source
Weight: 0.66
, structure
Weight: 0.65
Siblings amplifier
Weight: 0.64
, silicon
Weight: 0.36
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, polymer
Weight: 0.35
, filament
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred over copper wires 1.00
be preferred over copper wires for communication 0.97
is optic cable better than copper cable 0.84
be better than copper 0.84
connecting wires 0.81
be much faster than copper 0.81
is wire 0.79
is optic cables better 0.79
suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire 0.79
be optic cables 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(filament, is wire)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(filament, is wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(filament, is wire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(filament, is wire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)