fiber: suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optical fiber
Weight: 0.76
, shape
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.70
, bamboo
Weight: 0.69
, nylon
Weight: 0.67
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.64
, acetate
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire 1.00
is electromagnetic interference 0.83
be preferred over copper wires for communication 0.80
be better than wires transmitting 0.78
is optic cable better than copper cable 0.78
be better than copper 0.76
be much faster than copper 0.76
is optic cables better 0.75
be immune to electrical noise 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(optical fiber, be immune to electrical noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be immune to electrical noise)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be immune to electrical noise)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(optical fiber, be immune to electrical noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(fiber, be better than copper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fiber, be immune to electrical noise)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fiber, be immune to electrical noise)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(fiber, be immune to electrical noise)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be immune to electrical noise)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be immune to electrical noise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than wires transmitting)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be immune to electrical noise)